top of page

Measuring Strategic Impact (Well-being & Efficiency)

Delving deeper into Aitkin County's strategic success, we explore well-being and efficiency as key metrics in our engaging podcast series.

00:00 / 03:33

Helpful Reading

Helpful Reading

Helpful Reading


Welcome back. In our last segment, we discussed the importance of measuring strategic impact, focusing on engagement using Aitkin County's initiatives as a guiding example. In this episode, we'll look at two other crucial aspects of employee experience: well-being and efficiency. These components are pivotal in creating a holistic view of an organization's strategic success.

Well-being in the workplace is increasingly recognized as a critical component of organizational success. It goes beyond mere job satisfaction, encompassing elements like mental health, work-life balance, and a sense of belonging. For Aitkin County, this might mean implementing initiatives to support employee well-being, such as flexible work arrangements and mental health resources. But how do you measure something as intangible as well-being?

One way Aitkin can do this is to look at factors like reduced absenteeism, feedback from employee wellness surveys, and participation in well-being programs. For example, after implementing flexible work arrangements, we might observe a 20% decrease in absenteeism and a 30% increase in participation in wellness programs. These metrics might not only demonstrarte a positive trend in well-being but also correlate with increased productivity and employee retention.

Efficiency, another cornerstone of strategic impact, is about doing more with less, streamlining processes, and improving productivity. If part of Aitkin County's strategy were to focus on digital transformation to enhance efficiency, it would be essential to measure the effectiveness of new technologies and process improvements in a quantitative fashion.

For instance, to gauge efficiency, we might look at metrics like process completion times, cost savings, and user satisfaction with new systems. For instance, by digitizing certain approval processes, we might witness a reduction in processing time from 5 days to just 1 day, a 400% increase in efficiency. Additionally, cost savings could be realized through reduced paper usage and streamlined workflows.

Another hypothetical example might be that before digitization, the average processing time for a permit was around 10 days, involving multiple departments and manual paperwork. Post-implementation, the average time might drop to 3 days, with a user satisfaction rate of 85%. This would not only demonstrate time savings for the staff but also an enhanced user experience for residents.

So, to conclude, well-being and efficiency are integral measures of strategic impact. Thinking about measurement now, can help us set better develop strategic goals and effectively track and demonstrate strategic successes. In the next segment, I'll conclude our discussion by exploring the importance of continuous improvement and adaptation in strategic initiatives.

bottom of page